"The ghost wanders through Europe, the ghost of Putinism." It
was just the way to start Teresa May’s sensational anti-Russian speech,
especially since such classical rhetoric was well suited for her
statement, sustained in the best British traditions of Russophobic
propaganda. The British Prime Minister, of course, did not reach Churchill and his Fulton speech, but she tried very hard.
Theresa
May faced a difficult, almost impossible task: to put all of the
problems of the British political system on Putin, his “fake news” and
mythical hackers, as well as tough social conflicts that, like acid, eat
away the very fabric of English society. It
is tempting to write off what Theresa May diplomatically calls
“contention” or “dissonance in the West”, to the influence of the
Kremlin and to how cleverly Russian propaganda has learned to use
“information as a weapon”, but such rhetorical placebo is a sign of
weakness, not strength The
British premier is looking for the guilty in advance that the UK will
turn from its "British economic empire" into an "island Mexico" under
its leadership.
Theresa May’s main problem is not in the Kremlin, but in Brussels. The
British establishment, which hoped to use Brexit for its own purposes,
eventually outwitted itself and now does not know how to get out of the
trap of its own making. The
original plan was arrogant and prudent in English: it was required to
leave the European Union, get rid of annoying migrants and the
dictatorship of Brussels on many political and economic issues and
finally throw off the need to pay to the European budget. It was assumed that the UK itself would retain the main bonus from being in the EU - easy access to the European market. The
scenario was truly English - due to the fact that it intended to
preserve everything that is beneficial for the British economy, and at
the same time nothing to pay for it.