Teresa May can save only Russia

The British Prime Minister’s refusal of a second referendum on Brexit, combined with concessions to Brussels, made even more likely early elections in which May could be helped by the Russian issue.

Despite appeals by the parliamentary opposition and a gigantic demonstration in London on Sunday, in which about 700,000 Brexit opponents took part, British Prime Minister Theresa May firmly stated in Parliament that there would be no new referendum on this issue of Britain.
Responding to a request from the House of Commons, whether her office was working on scenarios of action in the event of a new referendum, as the British newspapers had written the day before, she said, as she cut off: No, this is not so. The government does not support the repetition of the referendum.

This was at the same time an answer to the participants of the March march on Parliament in London, which demanded a second Brexit referendum. The public campaign "Voice of the People", which organized this action, directed simultaneously against US President Donald Trump, is funded, among other things, by George Soros and Co. At the event, in which the mayor of London participated, there was a demand for the May government either not to leave the EU at all, or to give the British an opportunity to approve or reject the final agreement on Brexit conditions, which, judging by everything, will be very tough.
Brexit supporters won the first referendum with a minimal advantage (51.9%), and if they had held the second, the majority would have voted against. People everywhere are strong in hindsight. Since no one has ever left the EU and experienced no associated difficulties, the British initially simply did not know what they were really expecting: serious problems in the economy for a number of years, an increase in already high prices and much more. The interests of the average man and the globalists, who for their own reasons do not consider Brexit to be the right step, in this case coincided.

Without early elections can not do
This means that at any time against the prime minister a rebellion can break out in her own party, and that there will be no other way out of the crisis of power, except to go to early elections. May was between two fires, balancing between polar interests in this matter. The concession of one of the two sides means a loss of face, fatal in this case, since the premiere of its own party members, not to mention the British in general, had accumulated many other complaints. If it were not for the incitement of hatred against Russia, provocations in Salisbury and Amesbury, the May government could have fallen.

In this regard, it is not surprising that the May government and the British establishment as a whole have already begun to prepare the country for early elections as the only way to resolve the accumulated contradictions.
This was reported in plain text by the well-informed The Sunday Times: “Civil servants should prepare for any turn of events, given the weakening parliamentary support of the Prime Minister every day. They should develop reserve plans for all possible options, even unlikely ones, including the second referendum. ”
For some reason, everyone jumped at the ending of this quotation - a repeated referendum, plans to hold which May refuted in parliament. But this passage as a whole is actually quite different: British newspaper openly loyal to the establishment warns the newspaper to be ready for “any eventuality” due to the weakening of parliamentary support for Mei. The British were actually warned that early elections were about to be announced.

 
May’s only chance in early elections
At the same time, it became clear how May, who had lost herself on many fronts, would try to secure a victory for the conservatives. She will try to obscure the main issue as much as possible, about which early elections are being held, transferring arrows ... to Russia in order to mobilize around the power of broad sections of the British thanks to their support for what the power will begin during the pre-election period: the decisive expropriation of assets - money and real estate - Russian moneybags entrenched in Britain to at least partially cover the costs of a “divorce” from the EU.
In order to divert the attention of the general public from the unenviable conditions of a “divorce” from the EU, the Skrypaley case will also be sharply activated in the near future. This is also because the opposition leader Jeremy Corbin expressed doubts about the official version from the very beginning, and this will be used against him, because Skripal is expected to say exactly what May will need. Unless, of course, a “misfire” happens at an open press conference, and the former double agent, in order to save his daughter’s life, will not tell the truth that his former GRU colleagues have nothing to do with it.
Summing upThus, the coming showdown in domestic British politics will have unprecedented international consequences this time around. Firstly, the question of whether or not there will be a British in the EU will be finally decided. Since the Labor Party, in the event of winning the early elections, is likely to hold a new referendum on Brexit, which will end this time with the victory of its opponents. Secondly, May’s problems will obviously become Russia's problems, for they will lead to mass expropriation of Russian assets, new difficulties in the international activities of Russian companies, sharply inflaming anti-Russian hysteria and, accordingly, intensifying the global hybrid war of the West against Russia.